MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C86C87.F5E094E0" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Windows® Internet Explorer®. ------=_NextPart_01C86C87.F5E094E0 Content-Location: file:///C:/012B85D7/2007_09_14_LW.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

Court okays lawsuit against lawyers for alleged ‘deceit’

By Cristin Schmitz<= br> The Lawyers Weekly

September 14 2007

Alberta’s top court has permitted the fat= her of a Jehovah’s Witness teenager who died of leukemia to sue, on behal= f of his daughter’s estate, the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Can= ada lawyers who he alleges advised her to reject the blood transfusions prescri= bed by doctors.

[Hughes Estate v. Gnam, Brady and Watch Tower  Society et al.]

The estate’s claims for alleged “misrepresentation and deceit”– which are vigorously deni= ed by the two defendant lawyers – venture into terra incognita at= the crossroads of lawyers’ religious beliefs and duties and their professional obligations.

“The boundaries of freedom of religion are too unclear to warrant striking out” the plaintiff’s claims, the Alberta Court of Appeal wrote in reversing, in part, a decision below in fa= vour of the defendant lawyers and the Watch Tower Society which struck some of t= he claims.

Speaking generally, Justices Peter Martin, Jack Watson and Frans Slatter commented in their per curiam judgment released Aug. 31 that “it is not at all clear to what extent a religi= ous adherent can convince another person to take actions for religious reasons = that will cause him or her bodily harm or even death, even if the religious beli= ef is sincerely held.

“Assume, as an example, that a religious adherent persuades a third-party diabetic that he or she should stop taking insulin, and that divine intervention will cure him or her. Assume further = that the diabetic follows this advice and dies as a result. Can it be said that = the estate of the deceased would have no cause of action against the religious adherent? If the religious adherent withheld antibiotics from a sick person, either in favour of a divine healing, or in favour of traditional herbal remedies, is the religious adherent immune from an action if the patient di= es? Cases...  show the answer to these questions is far from clear.”=

The suit was commenced by Lawrence Hughes, administrator ad litem of the estate of Bethany Hughes, against Shane Brady and David Gnam of W. Glen Howe and Assocs. in Georgetown, Ont., the firm which does much of Watch Tower Society’s legal work.

Hughes, who is divorced from Bethany’s Jehovah’s Witness mother, Arliss, complai= ns of statements he alleges the two defendants made to his 16-year-old daughter. = Gnam represented Bethany, and Brady represented her m= other, in the unsuccessful appeal of a 2002 court order that made Bethany a tempor= ary ward of the state on the basis that her religiously-motivated refusal of th= e blood transfusions risked her life and thus demonstrated that she was incapable of exercising independent judgment about her medical care.

Gnam told The Lawyers Weekly neither he nor Brady made the alleged misrepresentations to Bethany or her mother. “As a lawyer my role is = to take the instructions of the client and represent them in court or represent them in a legal forum, and so my religious beliefs, whatever they might be, whether in agreement with my client’s or opposed to my client’s= are irrelevant and so it certainly would not be my responsibility to try to convince my client of my religious beliefs,” he said. “ThatR= 17;s well beyond my role as a lawyer and I think that would be improper conduct.”

Gnam called it ”a very worrisome development= 221; that a lawyer’s religious beliefs should be used to attack his professional representation of a client. Under Canadian law judges and lawy= ers are presumed to be acting as judicial officers in compliance with their professional standards, he said.
“We have never wanted to be in the situation in Canada where we ask t= he judge: ‘What religion are you?’ Or, for example, do we need to = know if a lawyer representing a gay person is gay? Does that impair, or enhance,= the ability to represent the person? We just don’t go there.”<= /o:p>

Gnam suggested religious prejudice lies at the root of the allegations which are proceeding to court.

“If you are a Jehovah’s Witness it’s presumed, you are stereotyped to be, putting pressure on people.= If I was a Jehovah’s Witness, it’s presumed that I am putting pres= sure on Bethany because she is a Jehovah’s Witness.”

However, Calgary’s Jennifer Pollock, who argued the appeal pro bono as one of several lawyers who have assisted the self-represented Hughes at no charge, said the case raises thorny issues ar= ound conflicts of interest, and the extent to which religious freedom encompasses actions taken in “non-religious areas” such as the provision of legal and medical advice.

“I would say the veil of religion was lif= ted by the [appeal] court,” Pollock suggested. “I think that for lawyers they should consider their position and the conflicts that they are placed in these matters. Certainly this [decision] should give lawyers caution.”

Bethany died in September of 2002, seven months after being diagnosed with a very aggressive form of cancer, and two months after doctors stopped her court-ordered chemotherapy, which was supported by blood transfusions, because the treatment wasn’t working. By then she= had had 80 blood transfusions.

With respect to Hughes’s subsequent civil suit, the Court of Appeal overturned, in part, a decision last year by Albe= rta Queen’s Bench Justice Patricia Rowbotham = (who has since been elevated to the appeal court). Justice = Rowbotham struck out Hughes’s allegations that the two lawyers, who the appeal court described as Jehovah’s Witness “elders”, engaged in deceit and misrepresentation by telling Bethany that “blood transfusions... would not help cure her cancer and intentionally misstated = to Bethany that a chemotherapy/blood transfusion treatment protocol for her leukemia was experimental when in fact it was not.”

Justice Rowbotham r= uled that the plaintiff’s claims of deceit and misrepresentation should be struck out because “the crux of the statement of claim is that the beliefs of the Jehovah’s Witness regarding blood transfusions are wro= ng and contrary to scientific knowledge.”

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled definitiv= ely that the law does not permit courts to adjudicate on the validity of religi= ous beliefs, she noted. “Mr. Hughes asks this court to interpret the cont= ent of a religious precept,” she reasoned. “This request is not justiciable and those portions of the statement of cl= aim which raise those allegations are struck.”

But the Court of Appeal ruled last month that C= harter jurisprudence makes it clear that the right to freedom of religion “i= s a very personal and subjective right.”

“Freedom of religion does not include any right to impose religious beliefs on third parties” and “is sub= ject to those limitations that are justifiable in a free and democratic society,” the appellate court stipulated.

“Whether religious views provide a defence to, or justification for, misrepresentations that cause bodily harm or death should only be decided on a full factual record,” they further held.<= o:p>

Alluding to the test for striking pleadings as disclosing no reasonable cause of action, the appeal court concluded that it was “not ‘plain and obvious’ that a sincerely held religi= ous belief would be an answer to a claim where application of the religious doctrine is said to have caused a death.”

Hughes, who says his approval of Bethany’s treatment regime led to him being shunned by his wife and other children, as well as being excommunicated and “disfellowshipp= ed” by his Jehovah’s Witness congregation, contends, in essence, that the Watch Tower Society, the two lawyers, Bethany’s minister, as well as a number of doctors and medical centres who treated her after her court-order= ed treatment failed, conspired in the wrongful death of his daughter.

With respect to Brady and = Gnam, he alleges the lawyers were “unable to differentiate their roles̶= 1; as counsel for his wife and daughter, and as lawyers&nb= sp; who act for, and are members of, the Watch Tower Society which conde= mns blood transfusions. With respect to Bethany’s medical treatment, they were therefore unable to give “objective and reasonable advice”= in her best interests, he contends.

Gnam adamantly denies that. “Our position has always been I was not Bethany’s minister, never was, never gave her religious advice of any kind, not my role,” said Gnam. “I c= ame into Bethany’s life when she was 16 years of age. She says to me ‘Mr. Gnam, represent me. I don’t wa= nt blood transfusions but I want treatment’. And I do the job.’ And further, to make this whole idea preposterous, i= s that Bethany was not represented by just me, but I am the only [one] that’s sued.”
Bethany was also represented, in appeals, by “eminent counsel” David Day and Eugene Meehan, he noted. “I think everybody accepts that neither Mr. Day nor Mr. Meehan are Jehovah’= ;s Witnesses.”

The appeal court stressed that the estate’= ;s pleadings do not require any examination of the “truth” of the defendants’ beliefs about blood transfusions since the misrepresentat= ions pleaded are that the lawyers falsely represented that blood transfusions ar= e an experimental treatment, and that such treatment is ineffective. “Ther= e is no indication on the record that either of these topics are the subject of = any religious belief of the respondents,” said the Court of Appeal. “The record indicates that the respondents are opposed to transfusion= s as a matter of faith, not because they are experimental or ineffective.”=

The appeal court also admonished that “the objective validity of the belief of the respondents that blood transfusions= are prohibited by scripture is not an issue in this litigation, will not be the subject of discovery or production, and will not be an issue at trial. This= is so even though the respondents may raise their sincerely held beliefs as a = defence or justification.”


The Lawyers Weekly


------=_NextPart_01C86C87.F5E094E0 Content-Location: file:///C:/012B85D7/2007_09_14_LW_files/themedata.thmx Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-officetheme UEsDBBQABgAIAAAAIQCCirwT+gAAABwCAAATAAAAW0NvbnRlbnRfVHlwZXNdLnhtbKyRy2rDMBBF 94X+g9C22HK6KKXYzqJJd30s0g8Y5LEtao+ENAnJ33fsuFC6CC10IxBizpl7Va6P46AOGJPzVOlV XmiFZH3jqKv0++4pu9cqMVADgyes9AmTXtfXV+XuFDApmaZU6Z45PBiTbI8jpNwHJHlpfRyB5Ro7 E8B+QIfmtijujPXESJzxxNB1+SoLRNegeoPILzCKx7Cg8Pv5DCSAmAtYq8czYVqi0hDC4CywRDAH an7oM9+2zmLj7X4UaT6DF9jNBDO/XGD1P+ov5wZb2A+stkfp4lx/xCH9LdtSay6Tc/7Uu5AuGC6X t7Rh5r+tPwEAAP//AwBQSwMEFAAGAAgAAAAhAKXWp+fAAAAANgEAAAsAAABfcmVscy8ucmVsc4SP z2rDMAyH74W9g9F9UdLDGCV2L6WQQy+jfQDhKH9oIhvbG+vbT8cGCrsIhKTv96k9/q6L+eGU5yAW mqoGw+JDP8to4XY9v3+CyYWkpyUIW3hwhqN727VfvFDRozzNMRulSLYwlRIPiNlPvFKuQmTRyRDS SkXbNGIkf6eRcV/XH5ieGeA2TNP1FlLXN2Cuj6jJ/7PDMMyeT8F/ryzlRQRuN5RMaeRioagv41O9 kKhlqtQe0LW4+db9AQAA//8DAFBLAwQUAAYACAAAACEAa3mWFoMAAACKAAAAHAAAAHRoZW1lL3Ro ZW1lL3RoZW1lTWFuYWdlci54bWwMzE0KwyAQQOF9oXeQ2TdjuyhFYrLLrrv2AEOcGkHHoNKf29fl 44M3zt8U1ZtLDVksnAcNimXNLoi38Hwspxuo2kgcxSxs4ccV5ul4GMm0jRPfSchzUX0j1ZCFrbXd INa1K9Uh7yzdXrkkaj2LR1fo0/cp4kXrKyYKAjj9AQAA//8DAFBLAwQUAAYACAAAACEAlrWt4pYG AABQGwAAFgAAAHRoZW1lL3RoZW1lL3RoZW1lMS54bWzsWU9v2zYUvw/YdyB0b2MndhoHdYrYsZst TRvEboceaYmW2FCiQNJJfRva44ABw7phhxXYbYdhW4EW2KX7NNk6bB3Qr7BHUpLFWF6SNtiKrT4k Evnj+/8eH6mr1+7HDB0SISlP2l79cs1DJPF5QJOw7d0e9i+teUgqnASY8YS0vSmR3rWN99+7itdV RGKCYH0i13Hbi5RK15eWpA/DWF7mKUlgbsxFjBW8inApEPgI6MZsablWW12KMU08lOAYyN4aj6lP 0FCT9DZy4j0Gr4mSesBnYqBJE2eFwQYHdY2QU9llAh1i1vaAT8CPhuS+8hDDUsFE26uZn7e0cXUJ r2eLmFqwtrSub37ZumxBcLBseIpwVDCt9xutK1sFfQNgah7X6/W6vXpBzwCw74OmVpYyzUZ/rd7J aZZA9nGedrfWrDVcfIn+ypzMrU6n02xlsliiBmQfG3P4tdpqY3PZwRuQxTfn8I3OZre76uANyOJX 5/D9K63Vhos3oIjR5GAOrR3a72fUC8iYs+1K+BrA12oZfIaCaCiiS7MY80QtirUY3+OiDwANZFjR BKlpSsbYhyju4ngkKNYM8DrBpRk75Mu5Ic0LSV/QVLW9D1MMGTGj9+r596+eP0XHD54dP/jp+OHD 4wc/WkLOqm2chOVVL7/97M/HH6M/nn7z8tEX1XhZxv/6wye//Px5NRDSZybOiy+f/PbsyYuvPv39 u0cV8E2BR2X4kMZEopvkCO3zGBQzVnElJyNxvhXDCNPyis0klDjBmksF/Z6KHPTNKWaZdxw5OsS1 4B0B5aMKeH1yzxF4EImJohWcd6LYAe5yzjpcVFphR/MqmXk4ScJq5mJSxu1jfFjFu4sTx7+9SQp1 Mw9LR/FuRBwx9xhOFA5JQhTSc/yAkArt7lLq2HWX+oJLPlboLkUdTCtNMqQjJ5pmi7ZpDH6ZVukM /nZss3sHdTir0nqLHLpIyArMKoQfEuaY8TqeKBxXkRzimJUNfgOrqErIwVT4ZVxPKvB0SBhHvYBI WbXmlgB9S07fwVCxKt2+y6axixSKHlTRvIE5LyO3+EE3wnFahR3QJCpjP5AHEKIY7XFVBd/lbobo d/ADTha6+w4ljrtPrwa3aeiINAsQPTMR2pdQqp0KHNPk78oxo1CPbQxcXDmGAvji68cVkfW2FuJN 2JOqMmH7RPldhDtZdLtcBPTtr7lbeJLsEQjz+Y3nXcl9V3K9/3zJXZTPZy20s9oKZVf3DbYpNi1y vLBDHlPGBmrKyA1pmmQJ+0TQh0G9zpwOSXFiSiN4zOq6gwsFNmuQ4OojqqJBhFNosOueJhLKjHQo UcolHOzMcCVtjYcmXdljYVMfGGw9kFjt8sAOr+jh/FxQkDG7TWgOnzmjFU3grMxWrmREQe3XYVbX Qp2ZW92IZkqdw61QGXw4rxoMFtaEBgRB2wJWXoXzuWYNBxPMSKDtbvfe3C3GCxfpIhnhgGQ+0nrP +6hunJTHirkJgNip8JE+5J1itRK3lib7BtzO4qQyu8YCdrn33sRLeQTPvKTz9kQ6sqScnCxBR22v 1VxuesjHadsbw5kWHuMUvC51z4dZCBdDvhI27E9NZpPlM2+2csXcJKjDNYW1+5zCTh1IhVRbWEY2 NMxUFgIs0Zys/MtNMOtFKWAj/TWkWFmDYPjXpAA7uq4l4zHxVdnZpRFtO/ualVI+UUQMouAIjdhE 7GNwvw5V0CegEq4mTEXQL3CPpq1tptzinCVd+fbK4Ow4ZmmEs3KrUzTPZAs3eVzIYN5K4oFulbIb 5c6vikn5C1KlHMb/M1X0fgI3BSuB9oAP17gCI52vbY8LFXGoQmlE/b6AxsHUDogWuIuFaQgquEw2 /wU51P9tzlkaJq3hwKf2aYgEhf1IRYKQPShLJvpOIVbP9i5LkmWETESVxJWpFXtEDgkb6hq4qvd2 D0UQ6qaaZGXA4E7Gn/ueZdAo1E1OOd+cGlLsvTYH/unOxyYzKOXWYdPQ5PYvRKzYVe16szzfe8uK 6IlZm9XIswKYlbaCVpb2rynCObdaW7HmNF5u5sKBF+c1hsGiIUrhvgfpP7D/UeEz+2VCb6hDvg+1 FcGHBk0Mwgai+pJtPJAukHZwBI2THbTBpElZ02atk7ZavllfcKdb8D1hbC3ZWfx9TmMXzZnLzsnF izR2ZmHH1nZsoanBsydTFIbG+UHGOMZ80ip/deKje+DoLbjfnzAlTTDBNyWBofUcmDyA5LcczdKN vwAAAP//AwBQSwMEFAAGAAgAAAAhAA3RkJ+2AAAAGwEAACcAAAB0aGVtZS90aGVtZS9fcmVscy90 aGVtZU1hbmFnZXIueG1sLnJlbHOEj00KwjAUhPeCdwhvb9O6EJEm3YjQrdQDhOQ1DTY/JFHs7Q2u LAguh2G+mWm7l53JE2My3jFoqhoIOumVcZrBbbjsjkBSFk6J2TtksGCCjm837RVnkUsoTSYkUigu MZhyDidKk5zQilT5gK44o49W5CKjpkHIu9BI93V9oPGbAXzFJL1iEHvVABmWUJr/s/04GolnLx8W Xf5RQXPZhQUoosbM4CObqkwEylu6usTfAAAA//8DAFBLAQItABQABgAIAAAAIQCCirwT+gAAABwC AAATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABbQ29udGVudF9UeXBlc10ueG1sUEsBAi0AFAAGAAgAAAAhAKXW p+fAAAAANgEAAAsAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKwEAAF9yZWxzLy5yZWxzUEsBAi0AFAAGAAgAAAAhAGt5 lhaDAAAAigAAABwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFAIAAHRoZW1lL3RoZW1lL3RoZW1lTWFuYWdlci54bWxQ SwECLQAUAAYACAAAACEAlrWt4pYGAABQGwAAFgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADRAgAAdGhlbWUvdGhlbWUv dGhlbWUxLnhtbFBLAQItABQABgAIAAAAIQAN0ZCftgAAABsBAAAnAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAJsJAAB0 aGVtZS90aGVtZS9fcmVscy90aGVtZU1hbmFnZXIueG1sLnJlbHNQSwUGAAAAAAUABQBdAQAAlgoA AAAA ------=_NextPart_01C86C87.F5E094E0 Content-Location: file:///C:/012B85D7/2007_09_14_LW_files/colorschememapping.xml Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/xml ------=_NextPart_01C86C87.F5E094E0 Content-Location: file:///C:/012B85D7/2007_09_14_LW_files/filelist.xml Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8" ------=_NextPart_01C86C87.F5E094E0--